With solid professional skills and cross-border dispute resolution experience, Lawyer Wang Jingzhan successfully represented the international sales contract dispute case, recovering a loss of 1116,163.48 yuan for the client, demonstrating efficient rights protection and legal wisdom.

🚀 Classic Case: International Sales Contract Dispute Victory

In 2024, Lawyer Wang Jingzhan represented Hebei Xintong Jiange Trading Co., Ltd. in a dispute with Jiangsu Guoxi Steel Co., Ltd. over an international sales contract. The core issue was that the seller provided a false bill of lading, causing the buyer’s advance payment to be irrecoverable. The court ultimately ruled to terminate the contract and the seller returned the RMB 116,163.48 and interest ().

📊 Key Points of the Case and Lawyer’s Strategy

Stage	Core Issue	Lawyer Wang Jingzhan’s Strategy	Case Result
Creditor’s Right Legitimacy Confirmation	Effectiveness of the Sudan Amoud Company’s debt transfer	Submit “Debt Assignment Agreement” and notification evidence, arguing that the debt assignment complies with Article 545 of the Civil Code ()	The court determines that the debt assignment is legally valid and effective
Contract Termination Basis	Seller did not ship and provided a false bill of lading	Claim that the seller’s behavior indicates non-performance of the main debt (Article 563 of the Civil Code) ()	Judgment to terminate the sales contract with form invoice number GXSC202081901
Repayment of Funds and Currency Conversion	Currency conversion standard for US dollar advance payment to RMB	Calculate with the exchange rate middle price on the day of the complaint signing (April 24, 2024)	Support the return of RMB 1116,163.48 and interest

✅ Demonstration of Lawyer’s Professional Value

• Cross-border Legal Application Capability: Accurately cite Article 41 of the “Law of the Application of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relations”, determining Chinese law as the applicable law of the case ().
• Evidence Chain Construction: Integrate key evidence such as form invoices, false bills of lading, bank payment vouchers, and WhatsApp communication records to form a complete evidence chain ().
• Efficient Rights Protection Results: From filing to judgment, only 2 months (filed on June 26, 2024, heard on August 27), quickly recovering economic losses for the client.